Previous page     Contents     Next page

3.8 f. Analysis of fluid inclusions in doped haplogranitic glass by Laser Ablation ICP-MS (B. Schäfer and D.B. Dingwell, in collaboration with D. Günther and R. Frischknecht/Zürich)

Most element partitioning studies between fluids and melts have employed bulk analytical techniques to determine the composition of the coexisting phases. A complementary approach is to trap the fluid phase as fluid inclusions within the quenched phase and then analyze directly the contents of the inclusions. Synthetic aqueous fluid inclusions in a glass matrix can be produced by rapidly quenching a fluid-saturated melt. We have investigated haplogranitic glass powders doped with 1000 ppm of elements ranging from Li to W in NaCl-solutions (up to 4 wt% NaCl). Reversal experiments with pure haplogranitic glass powders and doped NaCl-solutions (doped with up to 5 elements each at 1000 ppm level) have also been conducted. Syntheses were carried out in hydrothermal rapid-quench vessels at 2 kbars and 850°C.

The LA-ICP-MS technique permits the direct analysis of the glass matrix and the contents of the fluid inclusions in the same sample. Analyses have been carried out with the ICP-MS (ELAN 6000, Perkin-Elmer) in combination with an excimer laser (ArF 193 nm) at the Institut für Isotopengeologie und Mineralische Rohstoffe, ETH Zürich. These analyses yield time-resolved spectra for each investigated isotope including the Ar carrier gas for instrumental background determination, before the ablation process through the glass matrix and into the inclusion (Fig. 3.8-8). When the ablation process reaches the inclusion, a rapid
 

  Fig. 3.8-8: Intensity versus time for the laser ablation of a fluid inclusion in doped haplogranitic glass. The laser drills through the glass matrix into the fluid inclusion. The opening of the fluid inclusion is indicated by rapidly rising intensities of Na, Cl, and Cs, which are dissolved in the fluid. Ablation of the matrix continues after the inclusion is completely ablated out.

increase in signal intensity is observed. The ablation process is finished when the inclusion is completely ablated out and the laser continues ablating the glass matrix at the opposite end of the inclusion. The ablation of liquids produces signals much stronger than that for solids. Thus, fluid inclusion analysis requires separate calibrations for both the matrix and fluid inclusion. We use a NIST SRM 610 glass for matrix calibrations and external standard solutions (100 ppm element concentration) for the inclusion calibrations. Cl serves as an internal fluid inclusion standard because the bulk salinity can be determined independently by heating/cooling stage fluid inclusion microthermometry. Due to the low sensitivity of the ICP-MS to Cl, only analyses of fluid inclusions > 60 µm in diameter give reproducible intensity signals for 35Cl. The size of the analyzed inclusions range from 80 to 200 µm in diameter. For inclusions near the sample surface (< 40 µm depth) we utilize a 40 µm diameter laser spot size. At greater depths, we preablate the glass matrix with a larger beam (80 µm) before conducting the ablation process with the smaller beam as the inclusion is approached (Fig. 3.8-9).
 

 
Fig. 3.8-9: SEM picture of an 80 µm pit drilled into haplogranitic glass. The ablation process is continued after changing the laser spot size to 40 µm.

Analyses of fluid inclusions in an undoped matrix (e.g. quartz) show inclusion signals clearly distinguishable from the matrix signal and require only the instrumental background correction. In contrast, evaluation of the inclusion signal in a doped matrix turns out to be more difficult due to the influence of the matrix. This effect cannot be related directly to the matrix signal before and after the inclusion. To evaluate these fluid inclusion signals we apply a correction of the matrix influence in addition to the instrumental background correction for each investigated isotope based on a highly compatible matrix element. Continued investigation of fluid inclusions in a doped matrix should improve the reliability of this technique compared to bulk methods.

Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Deutschland
Tel: +49-(0) 921 55 3700 / 3766, Fax: +49-(0) 921 55 3769, E-mail: bayerisches.geoinstitut(at)uni-bayreuth.de